Jul 20 2010YOU GONNA DIE!: ExtremeShock™, The World's Premier Anti-Terrorist Ammunition

uhhuuu firts!

ehh First i meant :P

i also meant i love slobbing on knobs

By the way America, be proud of your fine accomplishments!!

This scares me.

i would like to bust a whole box of them fuckers into some firstarded firsttard.

"causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system" - WTF does that even mean?

i really meant to say I like slobbing on knobs and eating cats and quitely masturbating in the corner to secret voyeur cam video of Willie and Kate Tanner.

Did you know that 56% of statistics are fabricated on the spot, and there is a 67% chance someone is more likely to believe in something if it is backed by statistics?

fuck you!

normal bullets could kill terrorists still. why bother get the uber cool bullets?? lol

@#10- not cool, man. not cool.

Bluezorro, thats true only on the 34% of the cases...

ExtremeShock™ "Fang Face" and "Air Freedom" rounds: Making terrorists more deader than regular bullets!

Take that Terrorist/Commie/Pinko/Pansie/Nazi/Redneck/Burglar/DamnKids/Hobo/Human/Scum!!! *
* note maybe sold to Terrorist re-packaged as Anti-Capitalist/Imperialist/Facist/Nazi/American/Burglar/DamnKids/Infidel/Human/Scum!!!

terrorists are making some people richer every day

I thought the difficulties with killing terrorists was identifying who they are.. Maybe its a terrorist-seeking bullet that tracks down their evil ideas.

How do you stop terrorism? Delete it from the dictionary?

Thanks for posting your vintage VCR manual.

'nafukin' is the real terrorist here

I need to get a few boxes of those in the personal armory for Z-day. Can you imagine what that'll do to a zombie head? Choice!

Oh, and I think you should ban Nafukin

GW please ban-hammer this fucking douche

this is a bunch of bs.. i am in the military currently in iraq and i can tell you that we infact will not use this ammo for the simple fact that we are unable to by law because of nato... we have to use nato approved rounds, we cant even use hollow points here cause we dont shoot to kill and maim. because these rounds cause undue devastation.. i know, shooting is shooting but thank nato for that

@6 It means that it causes such massive trauma to so much of the body at once the CNS would shut down not knowing how to process the wound.

Is there a way GW could IP bad NAFUKIN... I can deal with one annoying post but 3 is just too damn much.

@5 why would this scare you? ARE YOU A TERRORIST!?! Guess i need to get me a box and go terrorist hunting!

So I can determine whether or not my neighboors are terrorists by unloading some of these into them? Because it seems they work only on terrorists, not civilions. I guess I should check myself just to be sure...or would they kill me for attempting to shoot my neighboors...but since my neigboors are safe only unless they are terrorists that makes me a vigilante, not a terrorist. Wow, these are foolproof, kudo's to the inventor!

I've yet to meet man who can outsmart Boolits

@30 NOT HERE IN CANADA! YOUR LAW IS DEFECTIVE!

YOU LOOSE, GOOD DAY SIR.

From The Onion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8XcVc_0ykU

Those fang rounds look rather interesting, either they will mushroom and fragment in a really cool way, or they will do nothing at all...

Heading over the site to see what they have in regards to ballistics data or videos.

yawn...these looks suspiciously similar to the Winchester Black Talon rounds from years gone by.

Those were the rounds that Surgeon General Joscelyn Elders (the one who wanted to legalize drugs because her son was a drug dealer) wanted to ban because they had "sharp points". She was in favor of safer bullets.

She was mentally retarded.

"e-shock" tested: http://theboxotruth.com/docs/bot23.htm

@NAFUKIN Yeah fucking with people if fine and dandy, but posting the same thing over and over is just trying to be an ass.

@34 that's exactly what i thought, but I will still buy them.

I thought devastating rounds in warefare wasnt ideal because of the theory 'every injured soldier takes 2 other soldiers out of the battle' (because they are trying to help wounded comrade)???

Wasnt the idea of ballistic tip etc rounds initially created for hunters as a human way of halting an animal quickly and dramatically (to prevent it running off and dying slowly in the bush)?

I dont see the point of these in warfare. In snipers rifles there'd be no need as the shot is normally well placed and has maximum effect anyway. In automatics its highly unlikely if you ARE hit its going to be by just one projectile anyway and i cant see too many humans popping back up to return fire are being smacked by automatic gunfire.

That said, i want some for next time i go hunting.

maybe when you use these bullets, it nullifies the new rules of engagements placed on terrorists.

and the first amendment only keeps the government from arresting you for talking bad about them in a public area. it doesnt stop from geekologie a private establishment from banning you.

I'd rather be shot with a metal space penis than a regular 9mm

Who cares!!! My boyfriend thinks the same with me. He- is eight years older than me, lol. We met online at an age gap dating site[ S E E K C O U G AR (C 0 /M)_]---a nice and free place for Younger- Women and Older Men, or Older Women and Younger Men, to interact with each other. Maybe you wanna check out or- tell your friends

DUKERJAWBS

I was under the impression that fragmentation rounds were illegal under international treaty? Or is that JUST for war combat situations?

@44 no if you go to their product site you are allowed to just buy them. Also I am not sure of that international treaty I mean I didn't know there were set guide lines for how to kill people. I mean it's a bullet it kills people just as effectively as similar bullets... But as I said i haven't heard of such a treaty.

1. These have been around for a LONG time.

2. They aren't as good as they claim. I'd much rather stick with my (significantly cheaper) Speer Gold Dots.

I would just like to add that this website is in some way associated with Vulcan Armaments AKA Hesse AKA worst AR15s in the world. Check the bottom of the webpage, there is a link to Pyramont, from Pyramont to Vulcan Armaments. This fact alone makes me not even want to order 10 bullets to reload my ammo with.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_convention

Generally, in the US, you can use what ever ammo you want to. For instance, in PA, the only law states that it is illegal to use Armor Piercing ammo in the commission of a crime, other wise, I can use frangible, tracer, or even incendiary rounds. rounds like these are pretty much legal anywhere you can carry a gun.

Military usage is a little different however, and there are a lot of restrictions on what you can shoot at people and vehicles.

America. FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

these pale in comparison to my nuclear-tipped bullets. upon each impact, a pea-sized nuclear bomb explodes in the person, killing them instantly. oh, and this gun: http://bit.ly/crbrNT (jump to minute 1:33)

Where are pictures of the gel tests for these? That would make these claims far cooler.

Great anti zombie capabilities!

@26 I swear physiology doesn't work like that. The body could go into shock due to massive bleeding, (I'm assuming necrosis doesn't have time to properly set in due to a large haemorrhage and consequent quick death) but shock is due to blood loss, and simple shunting of blood away from non-essential parts of the body until all that's left is the brain. The sympathetic nervous system will increase in innervation in order to do this, but it's got nothing to do with collapsing.

Extreme Shock; #1 most ridiculous packaging. ever.
I think the lightning bolts really sell it.

Holy shit, those look mean. Im glad that people are still finding new and horrible ways to kill eachother.

They should do away with all guns, tanks, bombs and aircraft and settle things the old way. Swords on horseback.

http://oneclicktoomany.blogspot.com

How can real weapons be sold as they were Power Rangers toys?
"our nations best warriors ... carry an advantage beyond their own heroism!"
This is shameful and so disturbing.
Do you think military and police enforcements take pleasure from harming their opponents? Thanks $deity they don't, trust me.

@49 - PA may have no law against using incendiary rounds. However, the US Federal Government does. They're very, very strictly regulated by the BATFE. I'd be careful using them if you have any.

I love my fang face rounds.

shipping department:
this is the 15th pallet of bullets we have shipped to afganistan today! i wonder who keeps buying these bullets over there?

I feel like a decent amount of military and law enforcement people have fantasies of killing/shooting someone, and getting rewarded for it.

Is it sad that we still spend time and money thinking of things like this?

I do agree however, mushrooming rounds good for zombies.

I love guns and bullets, but these are for retards. Gullible retards.

Yeah, these are definitely unusable in a military context. But, it's not NATO that makes the rules about this, it's the Geneva Convention:

"The Contracting Parties agree to abstain from the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core, or is pierced with incisions."

FAIL they should explode to aid the removal of body parts, oh yeah i also like putting barbie dolls in my butt.

just sayin`

This is stupid, and a waste of money.

For every person killed in war it there are several thousands of rounds shot. For the price difference of using these bullets versus conventional bullets you could just straight up shoot more normal bullets and probably get a better effect that way.

Also, the only people who could use these bullets effectively are domestic criminals, professional hit-men, or ironically, terrorists.

In conventional warfare shooting to disable a target is just as good, and sometimes even better, than shooting to straight up kill a target. Designing weapons to only kill a target just feels wrong... like something a psychopath would build.

uh, used by our nation's finest warriors? i think not. most definitely not on the approved list of NATO ammo. And fragmentation bullets have been around for dozens of years. and if the terrorist is wearing body armor, you are screwed, because these will most definitely not penetrate even crappy II or IIa armor. ...and shoot a home invader with one of these and the DA will probably think extra hard about finding a reason to prosecute you.

Umm..What? I thought dum-dum rounds were outlawed or something..?

My bullets kill better than yours!

Hey folks I am very much pro gun but we really do need to stop killing each other, at this point in human history its kinda immature don't you think?

But on the lighter side at least someone is going to make money from these.

Why do you need this? 1) No over penetration, which is important when there are innocent bystanders around. 2) Extreme amount of energy transferred to the combatant to take out a high risk combatant (terrorist that may be better armed than you are). These could be good for self defense as well, because if you have someone who does not respond to pain (high on narcotics), you want to take out the threat with lethality.

Wish somebody would use these on on 1

Man I thought the Hague Convention was still enforced

You can't carry these if you're deployed, sorry. Ball ammo only. These are personal defensive rounds. I call bs

this is very old.. I have been using this ammo for over 10 years!!!

Friggin' Mall Ninja ammo...

I'm certain these would never fall into the wrong hands.

Anyone want to starts a betting pool on which Mexican cartel will start killing innocent bystanders with these first?