Nov 29 2009Don't Copy That Floppy!: Evolution Of Storage

storage-small.jpg

This is a little graphic charting the progress in music storage. It's part of a larger graphic which also includes the evolutions of photo and data storage. Click THIS BIG-ASS LINK RIGHT HERE to see the whole thing. But warning: prepare to be wowed. Or at least moderately impressed with how far we've come. Now let's put a man on the moon! Or a cat. Oh. My. God -- SPACE FURBABIES -- WANT!!

Man, We've Come a Long Way From Floppies [gizmodo]

Related Stories
Reader Comments

Holy crap...that's a lot of room for porn storage. Nice work scientists and engineers!!!

I remember my parents got a new car in '92 and we had to specially order a CD player for it, my how far we have come.

Yeah, hours and hours of storage on an iPod of low quality MP3s. MP3s can be stored and send so easily because they are at most 10% of the original sound quality. The rest of the sound is made up by psycho acoustics. Listening to MP3s (or aiffs or whatever) all of the time will make you stressed because your brain has to make up the rest of the sound. FACT.

We have come so far! We can store loads of shit quality music!

WAV. FTW

@3 your theory < 320kbps

OLD

I hope I get a new iPod this year. I have soooo much music on my old one and don't listen to nearly all of it.

UNRELATED: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCfRdE1JQtQ

Guy tries to use Gold Mushroom Kingdom coins in conveniance stores.

It's cool, but the 'data' column is messed up. Some of those boxes should be green, not red.

This is stupid. It says a 120gb iPod = 2106 CD's. But 2106x700mb does not anywhere near equal 120gb.

60 Minutes
=
1Hour

yeh 60m=1h but they are saying a cd holds 80mins per 700mb which isnt true it can hold alot more if you use the same format they are using for the ipod like mp3 or whatever

Waah! Where's the 360k floppy? I have fond memories. For that matter, where's magnetic tape?

I'd be interested in seeing this diagram plotted against how long the data is expected to still be readable. Some cuneiform tablets are thousands of years old. Plot persistence vs density (you'll need a logarithmic scale on both axes).

Yup the colors are wrong on the data section. Reds where greens should be. Too bad cause it wrecks a sweet chart.

It's amazing yeah... but they more room you have, the more shit you collect, and you lose yourself in a sea of mediocrity. Libraries depress me in the same way... The people will need longer and longer lifespans just to keep up their "geek cred"... ;-)

http://www.newpaulsmith.com/paul-smith-wallets-c-521.html

The photo album says 100 photos...but it has a green square which is supposed to mean 40 photos....

WHAT THE FUUUUU-

too bad only 2 people noticed the mess up

very cool tho

60min(cd)=1hr(mp3) is wrong. The step were the audio is compressed to shit really needs to be included on this chart.

@ 18

Well, contact him and reprimand the shit out of him!

Hmmm. This graphic is a neat idea, but kinda poorly implemented.

#3: You are so wrong, you don't even know. naas is right. 320kbps FTW!

You missed paper tape, cassette tape, DECtape, DECtape 2, and 8-inch floppies for data storage.

wtf? tiny text on lower right corner says 1MB = 1024 Bytes
just saying

So um yea, why does the far right chart for data start showing red MB squares for the GB squares? Take a look at the DVD, all of the squares are red MB's. wtf, fail.

i like it

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to the post. Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. Email addresses are required to confirm comments but will never be displayed. To create a link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments.