## Thanks A Lot, Party Poopers: Physicists Prove Batman Would Plummet To Death Like A Rock Wearing A Cape

Because there's no such thing as the suspension of disbelief anymore, some party-pooping physicists (links to PDF of actual paper) took the time to prove that, while Batman could jump from a height of 400-feet and successfully glide for about 1,000 feet, he would land like a sack of shit thrown at a neighbor's porch. Whatever -- you don't know what kind of magic Lucius Fox packed into that cape!

In a paper titled "Trajectory of a falling Batman," David Marshall, Tom Hands, Ian Griffiths and Gareth Douglas studied the wingspan, height of descent and velocity representative of Batman's cape during one of his flights. As part of their research they exposed the bat cape's fatal flaws.

While this is enough to support a glide of sorts, according to the team's calculations, the essential accessory falls short. The 15.4-foot wingspan is only half of a hang glider. If Batman launched himself off one of Gotham's average 492-foot high towers he could glide successfully for approximately 1,150 feet.

The problem is the caped crusader's velocity would peak somewhere around 68 mph before leveling off at 50 mph -- enough speed to cause Batman to take a permanent dirt nap upon "landing."

Gee guys, thanks for proving something in a superhero movie isn't possible. Really. Maybe next you should tackle whether or not it's possible to suck all the fun out of something. Note to all readers: Do NOT go see The Dark Knight Rises with these @\$\$holes.

Thanks to towo and ashleigh, who can't wait to hear their explanation about how superheroes wouldn't really be able to breathe in space.

Related Stories
• June 3, 2013
The A.C.Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil, recently teamed up with Warner Bros. to make their children's ward more comforting to young patients by rebranding chemotherapy 'superformula' and covering IV bags with Justice League themed boxes. Then they created special c...
• April 30, 2013
These are Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman themed shot glasses with attached capes. Because what's a shot glass without a cape? "Way more practical." That's correct. Each glass will set you back \$7.50 (although for fairness they're also available from Busted Tees), which i...
• April 26, 2013
Drive fast and reckless mom, Batman will protect me! Continuing with yesterday's Batman theme on Geekologie, this is the \$150 Batman Carseat from KidsEmbrace. It's a kid's car seat that lets your little tyke ride around IN BATMAN'S LAP. With dual handjob cupholders! When I...
• Guest

now why cant it be possible? if you set your gloves, boots and maybe waist and knees up with electromagnets, and set the cape up with metal or magnets and co-ordinate the cape with those magnets, then batmans cape would be much like a squirrel suit

what the fuck do physicists know? They know nothing when it comes to superhero physics.

• David Marcenaro DeBernardis

Like a few of the other commenters here, i have to say, this "study" is flawed, because of the screenshot they used. In other shots, you see that his "cape: is substantially larger, as large as a hang glider at least, and YES, it was consistently shown throughout the film that he can manipulate the fabric into rigid sections, which he can then control the attitude and presumably curvature of, and it has rigid ribbing holding it together. In fact, in one scene, you just see the ribbing become rigid, and you see that it extends far beyond his arms. Compare this to say, a wingsuit/squirrelsuit, and it comes out favorably, and compared to a hang glider, it has advantages and disadvantages

• philip

hmm, you might like to google 'gary connery' - you know, the guy that landed a wingsuit! Ok, it was in boxes. How about a 37^2 ft (3.4^2 meters) parachute? :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

• his cape isn't even a triangle, it has large sections on each side and actually is shorter behind his back where it is connected to his neck and down his spine, making it like two wings he can hold out, the frame they used doesn't show how far back they flow, making them more like two small parachutes on either side. i think myth busters should take a closer look at this one!

• Andreas Rentoumes

that frame of the film is not accurately showing batman cape size (wingspan?) since that frame is technically through the eyes of gothams fear gassed citizens and is what they percieve batman as while on the gas, not what he actually looks like. in many other 'real world' scenes in the movie and dark knight his cape is way larger when extended into glider wings. suck it, math! theory disproven, batman still owns.

• Guest

That's funny and sad at the same time. wow....that is now possible. And I do like the Batman via comic & tele.

• MeggyMonster

Great. Next they're going to tell us that invisible jets can't fly! D:

• ZomBBombeR

assholes!

• Now I'm no scientist here and whilst Nolan's sense of realism may still be based in fiction, but isn't Batman's cape more advanced than a standard hang glider in that he can manipulate it by forming it into more of a parachute; when he lands, he lifts his arms up for the 'wings' to catch air and decelerate.

• \$18922249

Well Devon... I am a scientist. And no, Batman's cape is not more advanced than a standard hangglider. In fact, it is common knowledge around the scientific circles that Batman's cape is made from a simple bedsheet reenforced with duct tape and tent poles. Now you know!

• ZomBBombeR

Great observation I wanted to say something similar but was too annoyed atm.

• but his cape is made of memory cloth...

As if we needed physicists to know that Batman couldn't glide.

• rikster81

How about a paper on the trajectory to a vagina

• Guest

I'm now predicting a new project for our beloved Myth Busters.

• \$18922249

This paper will have an impact factor of JUSTICE!

• Hans Olo

Next they take a look at the helicopter catch in Superman...

• Lee

No no, next they take a look at the Flash and how moving faster than light is proven impossible!

• Who gave them the grant for this study, Stan Lee?