Jan 29 2010Discrimination!: Australia Bans Small Breasts

You know that saying, "more than a mouthful's a waste"? Yeah, me neither. And apparently neither does Australia. The country has decided to ban smaller looking breasts from adult content because of pedo-y concerns.
The ban (RC) on small breasted women in adult publications has been made by the Australian Classification Board allegedly on the grounds that such images could be construed as child pornography, even where those publications comply with American law and keep certification that performers are over 18.
Female ejaculation has been banned on the incredible grounds that "the depictions are a form of urination which is banned under the label of 'golden showers' in the Classification Guidelines" and/or "Female ejaculation is an 'abhorrent' depiction." Notably here male ejaculation is completely legal under the same guidelines, attracting an X rating in Australia.
First of all, breasts of all sizes are awesome. And secondly, what's up with this female ejaculation thing? Talk about a double standard. You outta be ashamed of yourself, Australia! And to think Britain used to use you as a giant penal colony. What happened?
Millions Of Extra Sites To Be Censorsed As Australian Gov. Bans Small Breasts, Female Ejaculation [inquisitr]
Thanks to Korey and Tofu Butcher, who'll take all the breasts they can get, regardless of size or number of nipples.

Reader Comments
1. asperflux - January 29, 2010 2:45 PM
Long live the robots.
We are first
2. Yorkiebar - January 29, 2010 2:45 PM
Pic explains exactly why this is so wrong.
3. we are not like you - January 29, 2010 2:50 PM
regulated porn is regulated
4. Closet Nerd - January 29, 2010 2:50 PM
They changed from a penal colony, to a colony of peni(ses).... just sayin
5. Closet Nerd - January 29, 2010 2:55 PM
I must say Australia, this is a GREAT idea....because now, rather than the pedophiles 'jackin it' to small breasted porn stars (imagining they are younger), INSTEAD now they have to go out and search for actual victims..... good idea!!!!
I mean banning beastiality films seems to have done wonders for the people in the southern part of the U.S. with animal fetishes..... just sayin
6. FIRST - January 29, 2010 3:02 PM
YOUSUNKMYBATTLESHIP.
7. flaberghast - January 29, 2010 3:05 PM
HELL YES!
revolt against the flat chested chicks
LONG LIVE BIG TITTIES!
8. WTFEver - January 29, 2010 3:06 PM
Female ejaculate has been tested and it is comes from the urethra (same as a male's does) but like semen is NOT urine. It's just a chemical fact and yes, it has been analyzed and broken down into its components. It comes from the Skene's gland..like seminal fluid in men comes from the prostrate.
While some porn stars, I'm sure, drink a bunch of water and "fake' their orgasms doesn't mean that intense female orgasms should not be allowed to be filmed. So fucking sexist.
As for the small breasts...well that is just so fucking idiotic I have no words.
Where is the tiny dick ban? Or the ban on pubic hair being shaved? I guess all porn needs hairy ape men and women now? WTF WTF WTF
9. bribios - January 29, 2010 3:06 PM
Restricting what people can and can't see in pornography is always a good move. Looks at Japan. They censor the genitalia entirely, and they are the least perverse people in the world!
10. theory - January 29, 2010 3:10 PM
@ #5
Right, way to sneak one in there to bash the southern U.S. because those lameass stereotypical jokes just never get old do they?!?!
ha. ha. ha.
You're almost as funny as Jay Leno…
11. That Girl - January 29, 2010 3:15 PM
Wouldn't it have been more effective to ban the barely legal porn instead?
12. eulogy - January 29, 2010 3:18 PM
Okay, where's the ban on small wangs?
13. That Girl - January 29, 2010 3:22 PM
Or not that I have anything against a nice shaven vagina, but I think if you are gonna go for something to stop pedophilia why the boobs? I started having boobage at a very young age. Boobs don't prove age. At least that's what the bouncer at the bar told me.
14. Closet Nerd - January 29, 2010 3:24 PM
@10 No, no..... no, they never get old
15. Jaded Icon - January 29, 2010 3:26 PM
I seriously would take small boobs over big fake ones any day of the week. Obviously, the lawmakes that made this don't give a sh*t about pedos. They just have a preference of larger breasted women. Very lame....
16. Babbleon - January 29, 2010 3:28 PM
I wonder if they even have it down to a science. Like,..
Anything below a B cup is banned from Australia. Then it follows that when selling porn within the country, you have to submit the breast sizes of all your actresses along with picture proof. You know, just so the ratings board can make sure that the company is being truthful.
17. Babbleon - January 29, 2010 3:30 PM
@ Jaded Icon: Well...i guess this gives all the small breasted porn stars an excuse to get implants.
18. Matt - January 29, 2010 3:31 PM
So... will they arrest me for having sex with a flat chested woman?
19. suomynonA - January 29, 2010 3:32 PM
I wonder why anyone cares about this if they don't live in Australia.
Just because Australia banned it in their country doesn't mean its not available everywhere else in the world.
20. ~zeus~ - January 29, 2010 3:34 PM
ok, ppl just thank god your not in Australia or Japan so your porn collection is safe!
Ooo and about Japan; they censor the genitalia entirely but keep that Hentai shit WTF?! I'm all for porn but don't get grown men watching a porn cartoon, thats just wrong!
21. Erica - January 29, 2010 3:48 PM
I'm sorry but WTF? Shaved pubic hair, barely legal fantasies, pigtails and the works have got to weigh in heavier on the pedo-scale than having small breasts which is completely natural for many women.
22. Vero - January 29, 2010 3:57 PM
Ow, now i can never be a pornstar in Australia! D: that was my DREAM, you know?
23. JADE - January 29, 2010 3:59 PM
@12... I was just think the same thing. Also I have nice t*ts but I don't see the big deal with those things. I mean us girls really should be able to know how big a guys weiner is before we even say hi. Because that is what you guys do, you will over look a girl if she has small t*ts. We don't know what we are getting till we take your needle d**ks home. It's just not right ..........just sayin.
24. GHEY MAN - January 29, 2010 4:00 PM
Australia what the fuck is wrong with you... just what the fuck is wrong!?
25. Australia sucks - January 29, 2010 4:02 PM
If they are going to ban anything they should ban ugly dudes from having sex with hot chicks. Why? Cause that just pisses me off. Plus it makes it extremely unrealistic.
26. ~zeus~ - January 29, 2010 4:06 PM
@23; its poker, i cant show u my hand just because yours is on the table
Ooo and its not about t*ts, its all in the a$$
http://msp259.photobucket.com/albums/hh311/catnmause/assman-1-1.jpg
27. Ben - January 29, 2010 4:11 PM
Does every new australian law start with some old guy in parliament going "You know what I hate..." This year it's adult starts with small breasts.
How can you possibly ban something in the media that's not remotely illegal otherwise. It's just as ridiculous as banning chocolate bars because they could be construed as someone eating poop.
28. I'm Using Technology - January 29, 2010 4:11 PM
So that's who all the people are over at the Superficial who say that women with small breasts look like 12-year-old boys and if you like them you must be a pedo. I thought they were fat chicks but it turns out they're Australians!
29. Closet Nerd - January 29, 2010 4:16 PM
@23 You have nice t*ts? Prove it! just sayin
@21 Once you are an adult, pigtails become 'handlebars'..... hanlebars are HOT..... Salma Hayek in Dogma.... thats all I have to say about that
30. Artur irado - January 29, 2010 4:21 PM
Damn you communist ex convicts
31. The Stig - January 29, 2010 4:36 PM
"... when looking for a spouse, the fact is that what we really want is +its like the Alps, legs like the Silk Road and a face like Kiera Knightley´s."
-Jeremy Clarskon
32. Sanjisan - January 29, 2010 4:36 PM
So yea, I cant even begin to tell you how bs that pedo-y concern is lol. I can go to any local HS and point out about every 3rd chick that is under 18 and has big boobs lol. Should have just banned the barely legal
33. Naked Chicks Rule - January 29, 2010 4:52 PM
This isn't Australia that's doing this, it's the Christians who live in Australia.
I mean, is there *anything* that the Christians can't fuck up? They make everything suck. Of course, if we do the only sane thing & outlaw it, they'll bring out their most powerful weapon: The WATB Cannon. They'll point it at everyone & blow them away w/ their bleating & whining & "I'm so oppressed" crap.
34. voltron - January 29, 2010 5:11 PM
What a redonkulous thing to do. I mean first of all small t*ts are often attached to a tight body. There porn is just gonna be filled with fatties. Secondly, there just banning the female ejaculation because some dude on the board is convinced the female orgasm is a myth. Just 'cause that dude sucks at sex doesn't mean he should ruin porn for all of Australia.
35. Andrew - January 29, 2010 5:32 PM
BRAINWAVE: Ban pedophiles. How about that idea? THAT is more productive.
Australian people who are not pedos: I will supply you all the legal small boobed porn you want! :D
36. Tim - January 29, 2010 5:35 PM
@33 Every single Aussie I've met has been an Atheist, just saying
37. Dru - January 29, 2010 5:40 PM
So...this actually kind of offends me.
I don't have big breasts. And that means I'm not a woman? I must not be, because women don't get called "almost kiddie porn".
Yeah. Australia: Gonna have to say "You suck" on this one.
38. Kittie - January 29, 2010 5:51 PM
Okay, WHAT? Australia continues to be stupider and stupider. You pretty much couldn't pay me to live there.
Small boobs can be both cute AND hot, and if you're over 18, THAT'S THAT. You're NOT pedo-fodder. So suck it up, Australia, and deal with it.
39. milllss - January 29, 2010 6:46 PM
I must say ( I'm from Australia - lurk Geekologie all the time ) that we have the 2 worst politicians that have ever come - bordering on Dictating
names - Stephen Conroy and Michael Atkinson 2 of the worst people in the world who believe taking away people's freedom is a solution to the problem
40. Alan - January 29, 2010 7:03 PM
It's not a ban on small breasts. The child porn laws include that it's bad if the person appears to be underage even if they are of age (which I disagree with). When trying to see if someone appears underage, they look at things like physical development.
A woman can have small breasts in porn in Australia without it being a problem. It's if the person looks underage that is the issue, no matter what her breast size is.
Again, I disagree with this subjective aspect to the laws. And I am passionate about the problems surrounding censorship. This is just not a ban on small breasts as it has been construed as on many sites, though.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/29/has-australia-really-banned-small-breasts/#respond
I'm glad that this is getting attention, because people responsible for classification and censorship in Australia are being ridiculous and backlash could help bring social change. I just wish that it was getting attention in a more accurate way, so there would be less wasted energy targeted towards misinformation.
41. Gloria - January 29, 2010 7:20 PM
@40
Thanks for enlightening us. It's refreshing to hear from someone having to deal with the BS, and proving to us that not all of Australia is insane (since how could they otherwise have let this get through?).
I agree with many of the posts here, that if they were seeking to avoid the very 'hint' that something might be kiddie porn, they can't ignore shaved actors and actresses, nor really role-play with childish costumes. Both of which would be ridiculous to prohibit IMHO.
Just because someone likes small breasts on a woman-- doesn't make them a pedo. just sayin.
And of course the ejac thing is just... ridiculous. Why are they even banning golden showers? If they are two consenting adults, and no one gets hurt... wtf?
42. Scdo - January 29, 2010 7:33 PM
As a proud Australian, I can look at any size titties any time I want. Cuz I has teh internetz.
43. Mitch - January 29, 2010 7:49 PM
@42 INTERNETZ FTW
Australia ftw!
getting disgusting american golden shower porn from search engines , not for the effing win
44. Kije - January 29, 2010 8:04 PM
So, I'm guessing they missed Mass Effect 2 after all...
45. smerz - January 29, 2010 8:05 PM
@42, this is actually part of the great australian internet firewall that's coming in. for non-australian users out there, the australian government has seen fit to implement a massive filtering scheme of the interbutz.
under the guise of protecting children with parents too lazy to parent, a secret list of sites which are 'refused classification' will be blocked by ISP filtering.
this isn't limited to child pron, but extends to the accidental filtering of legal poker sites, information about euthanasia, and a lot of video games (australia has no r18+ game classification, so anything requiring one needs to be watered down or banned)
46. loadquicker - January 29, 2010 8:32 PM
Meh, I'm from Australia. I didnt have someone banging on my door asking if I wanted this law passed, there wasn't exactly loud-and-proud-in-your-face advertising about it. Didn't even know about it till I came on Geekologie this AM. Who gives a shit anyway? Thats what the internet is for. ;)
47. Billy Rapture - January 29, 2010 8:47 PM
@33 You're just another angry atheist trying to blame God for bad political decisions.
48. jakerocks! - January 29, 2010 9:35 PM
lover of all sizes. though once you have one size, u fantasize about the other.
49. Weaponoid - January 29, 2010 9:39 PM
Sounds like a bunch of priests trying to cover their tracks...
50. Lauren R. - January 29, 2010 9:45 PM
The Australian people can't be blamed for their government doing whatever it wants either behind their backs or in their faces with no public support whatsoever. Both the article writer and all of the "lol stupid Australians" commenters are obviously ignorant retards.
51. Ignorant Retard - January 29, 2010 9:54 PM
LOL, stupid Australians!
52. Raptor Assassin - January 29, 2010 10:50 PM
Yea its all fun and games until this nonsense sets a precedent in Western Europe and inevitably the States. This legislation is counterproductive and arbitrary. How about making examples of actual pedos or combating existant kiddie pron? WHERE IS CHRIS HANSEN?????????
53. jilli jimpler - January 30, 2010 12:00 AM
I'd smash you all... go complain about that pussies.
None of you mean anything so keep your lips closed and make way for the ASS GRENADE
54. Naked Chicks Rule - January 30, 2010 12:15 AM
@47
Wow, that's not just stupid, that's like, Epic Stupid.
55. cd - January 30, 2010 12:45 AM
don't worry guys,
We are going to assassinate Stephen Conroy at some stage.
hang in there.
56. ChimneyBreath - January 30, 2010 1:04 AM
I've seen fifteen year old's with bigger breasts than a lot of adults. You're telling me these fifteen year old's are more acceptable in a porno than a small breasted adult?
Ridiculous. It's like walking upto a counter, asking for a pack of cigarettes WITH a valid I.D. and being told no because you just look under 18... (Here in Australia anyway)
My 23 year old girlfriend is still asked for I.D.
Perhaps I better break up with her before I'm arrested...
57. Genius Jones - January 30, 2010 1:10 AM
Isn't this just going to encourage more Australian models to get breast implants? I think that is a shame. Now, I know I may be alone in this, but I will take a natural set of A's over a fake artificially inflated set of D's any day of the week.
58. 747 - January 30, 2010 1:35 AM
What's funny, Is that Prostitution is completely legal in Australia. You can go to a mall and pay 50 dollars for sex. And yet they're worried about small breasts.
59. Rachael - January 30, 2010 1:41 AM
As an Australian I feel I should comment.. That's fucked.
60. Porphyrin - January 30, 2010 1:48 AM
This really is SUCH a beat up. Where's your credible source? Can you back this up?
"The country has decided to ban smaller looking breasts from adult content because of pedo-y concerns."
Has anyone even READ the relevant legislation? Where does it mention small breasts being banned for "danger of pedophilia" reasons? Tip: here's a link:
http://www.comlaw.gov.au/ComLaw/Legislation/LegislativeInstrumentCompilation1.nsf/0/149B1F3EC2A074C6CA257412000164C7/$file/PublicationsGuidelines2005.pdf
61. Tim - January 30, 2010 3:08 AM
@ 54 Nice comeback, very clever
62. FBX - January 30, 2010 3:35 AM
@60 Nice five year old document bro.
63. Porphyrin - January 30, 2010 3:50 AM
@62 LOL did you even open it? It's the most recent Guidelines, written in 2008. Obviously you just looked at the link.
64. FBX - January 30, 2010 3:59 AM
@63 Nice two year old document bro.
I know Geekologie isn't always right on the button, but I think it's fair to assume this small breasts thing wasn't decided over a year ago; so no, it wouldn't be in there.
65. Porphyrin - January 30, 2010 4:23 AM
@64: The 'small breasts' thing is not in the mentioned specifically in the legislation at all and the document I posted is the most recent guidelines for the legislation (ie legislation has not recently changed).
This whole 'story' started with a press release from the Australian Sex Party last week. The claims by this minor political party have not been backed up with any credible evidence. It has since gone viral around various sites on the 'net' originally based on this. My point for posting the guidelines to the Classification legislation is to point out the fact that the claims in the article above are unfounded.
The bottom line is Australia has NOT banned smaller looking breasts from adult content in the way it is being implied here. It is a false and sensationalist accusation. also see link in comment #40.
66. Graf Zeppelin - January 30, 2010 5:23 AM
the ejac part just confirms the boring yet persistent patriarchal and phallocentric structure of thinking that anything pertaining to female sexuality is an abnormality and must be crushed. which doesn't really change anything from status quo and certainly doesn't prevent childporn. in a worst case it just reinforces the victorian view of sex as something done by an uncontrollable male on an unsuspecting and faintly protesting female, which of course is made easier the younger the female is. I won't say this sucks because sucking is good. this is shit.
67. aussseee - January 30, 2010 5:52 AM
i'm australian,
and this is just criminal.
big breasts scare me.
68. Shane - January 30, 2010 6:29 AM
what the hell has my country done now , this is crap , where will i see my small breasted women now , this means war
69. Desiree - January 30, 2010 1:03 PM
Hmmmm...I guess you won't be allowed to view typically small filipina breasts there in Australia!
70. this one chick. - January 30, 2010 1:58 PM
ok, ban small breasts... wowwww. thats just... wow. can you get any more pathetic? everyone has there preferences. maybe some guys dont want a bunch of excess shit flying around? haha. i mean, big small or even medium, they are ALL boobs no matter what age you are. i myself dont have the biggest rack but ive been told many times that they are "handfulls of joy" haha. so i dont see why they'd blow this up into an actual issue. o0o0o! lets have them ban small asses next, cause i have an ass XD
71. Eva - January 30, 2010 2:16 PM
I am 26 years old, and have a flat chest.
My cousin is 12 years old, and has C cups.
So, is it more okay for a kid like her to take part in child porn?
I'd rather pedos watch flat chested women, than fuel the illegal child porn industry.
72. Brandon Haraughty - January 30, 2010 6:47 PM
How sad. A nice A size breast can be absolutely gorgeous. Actually I highly prefer A's and B's to C's and D's. Watching a lot of porn is not high on my list of things to do but geez. To make it illegal to have porn for someone with a preference for small breasts! Law makers keep proving themselves to utter morons. Is there no one in the law making arena with enough sense to stop the rest of the idiots from making such moronic laws.
73. AshamedAussie - January 30, 2010 11:08 PM
Here in Australia, the small number of Christians that we do actually have tend to sneak into annoying places of power such as the government and classification boards because no true Australian actually pays attention to them. Then they fiddle with the rules and generally cause headaches.
Ok, the facts in GW's article aren't completely correct but that is pretty much what these laws will boil down to.
But this is far from the worst thing that these idiots have taken away from us. Some git called Michael Atkinson has managed to get Left4dead banned and the only thing we can buy legally in Australia is a copy with all the gore programming removed. He is now in the process of getting Modern Warfare 2 banned on the basis that you shoot at humanoid figures.
This is sacrifice we pay for having the best beaches.
74. Lance J. M - January 30, 2010 11:14 PM
I hate Australia, now.
75. Lance J. M - January 30, 2010 11:15 PM
I hate Australia, now.
76. zorkat - January 31, 2010 7:08 PM
hey its not us Australians who chose this!! its the stupid men and women who are too prude and stupid who are the leaders of these committees who decide this shit. but who the FUCK put them in charge!
everyone i know [i'm Australian btw] thinks these new bans are fucking bullshit and we have no fucking clue why they're discriminating it!
harden the fuck up and get the fuck out.
77. Skate - February 1, 2010 12:28 AM
I am Australian I know this is ridiculous I can also tell you why it is happening. Our Office of Film and Literature is trying desperately to show us ,as a nation, and the world that they as religious zelots can "control the sensory input of the religiously unenlightened" It is not only our porn that is being censored our movie music and video games are censored to. With the internet these "morally sound" dickheads are feeling a loss of control and are coming down harder than ever because of it. What will they ban next Use of dildo's cause they are classed as a toy?It is a shame our F*^#$%T of a prime minister and his corrupt cabinet don't have the balls to say "Know what our citizens are old enough to chose there own porn" Harsher punishments for Pedophiles. Not only is our government crap( yes government with a little g) But our legal system is ridiculous also.
78. Jelly - February 1, 2010 1:19 AM
I don't understand how this makes any sense, why is it wrong for a pedo to be turned on by Old women who look young? Pr0ns are legal and socially accepted. Kind of.
Its like banning nicoderm/nicabate because smokers may get nicotine out of it.
Talking and such is useless however.
Can anyone think of a way to stop this from getting passed?
79. Candice - February 1, 2010 2:18 AM
I reckon everyone with a blog should write a big long post on how to make a woman have a female ejaculation!
Aussies might not be able to learn through porn sites and mags now but many of us surely know this ancient art of making that special juice come flying out of a woman's vagina! (hot stuff!)
SHARE THE JOY!
Can the site be blocked if it doesnt actually contain images but a general description of a female ejaculation, how it happens, why it happens etc how it can be done? for educational purposes. . . We cant see it through porn now but at least it can be practised in the privacy of our own homes with our women/partners! ;) they cant stop that part :D
80. MEGA DICKMEAT - February 1, 2010 4:03 AM
@ALL - fuck off. your whole planet is a gay fuck fest and none of you are smart for using the internet or acting like you rule cos you look at porn. none of you even know what the issue is, you just read some gay post on some fuck ass site and talk shit like you're something more than a piss + shit + blood stain on a dinger.
its not christians or even the government behind this.
its my dick some come and get a taste
81. dparks - February 1, 2010 11:23 AM
Looks like little Mr.MEGA DICKMEAT forgot his Ritalin this morning...
... and has pewpy-diapers.
82. Boog - February 1, 2010 12:04 PM
@81
Any special technique or link that you'd like to share?!
83. Talia - February 2, 2010 2:45 AM
I'd just ike the point out that not all Australians want this, in fact I haven't heard anything positive said about it at all. Secondly it's most a media beat up for publicity no so ammendment has actually been propsed as yet.
84. davidbaer - February 2, 2010 5:57 AM
Often we forget the little guy, the SMB, in our discussions of the comings and goings of the Internet marketing industry. Sure there are times like this when a report surfaces talking about their issues and concerns but, for the most part, we like to talk about big brands and how they do the Internet marketing thing well or not so well.
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
85. DevonS - February 7, 2010 3:56 PM
Y'know, I can just imagine the Australian government executing all small-breasted women... And where the hell to the actual children come into play there? Are they going to be arrested because their breasts are still developing?