Dec 9 2009Neat, But I'll Pass (The Time!): A Crazy Clock

That isn't your grandfather's grandfather clock. But that may be him trapped inside! (it's not -- please don't call and wake up your grandma). You see, that's really a television screen. Tricky!

This clock does not actually have a man inside but a flatscreen that plays a 24 hour loop of this video by the artist watching his own clock somewhere and painstakingly erasing and re-writing each minute.

Admittedly, it is a neat idea, I just can't believe somebody dedicated 24 hours of their life to recording themselves writing the time. That's ridiculous. I mean, I've got Warcraft characters to level up.

Youtube

Thanks to Conspiracy, who's convinced daylight savings time was created by the government to throw off our internal clocks and keep us in check. And he's right.

Related Stories
Reader Comments

first

2nd i win

Actually, he probably only wasted 12 hours of his time, because with clocks like these, you can't tell the difference between AM & PM..... just sayin

What Closet Nerd said. Analog clocks don't differentiate between AM and PM. Doesn't make sense that he'd spend 24 hours. I'm guessing that the source that you cite (but don't attribute, tsk tsk) simply assumed it took him 24 hours.

@ 4... Eric, just because you didn't understand CN doesn't mean the rest of us have to read your babling... MLIG

Daylights saving didn't used to be as long as it is now.... the Bush Administration extended Daylights Savings Time because people spend more money when it isn't dark, so if it gets darker later, people will spend more money..... just sayin

@5 http://de.acidcow.com/pics/20091130/gif_04.gif
Eric did understand what I was saying, apparenty you didn't.... just sayin

A real artist would've actually stood in there for the rest of his life.
Lame.

why is the 4 "IIII" and not "IV"

@9, because he's an 'artist' supposedly

why are white ppl always red and pudgy

I want one!

I can see him after standing there for 12 hours... proudly showing his accomplishment to a friend... who promptly points out that he had the wrong roman numeral of IIII instead of IV...

@Dr Collossus - Traditionally IIII is used on clock dials instead of IV. See Wikipedia~~> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals#Calendars_and_clocks

if thats the case why isn't 9 represented as VIIII

HOW DID YOU KNOW WHAT I WAS THINKING GW!?! OH NO THERE'S A HOLE IN MY HAT!!! AHHH!

When you start to notice the IIII instead of IV, you'll be suprised at how many clocks did it. (do clocks do it? ((I hope so)))

@most of you: Roman numeral IIII is Bullspit and i don't like it!
@5 Google Fail, you might see yourself.......burn!
Clock is bad ass but i wouldn't waste a flatscreen on it...unless i was (@11) murf and was boring enough to waste other peoples time with unrelated racist comments

This is the coolest clock ever!

But does it come in bacon?

Louis XIV, king of France, who preferred IIII over IV, ordered his clockmakers to produce clocks with IIII and not IV, and thus it has remained.

the real question is why didn't he rename himself Louis XIIII

Only some deluded hippy student "artist" could think this was anything other than stupid and pointless.

@ 22

You must work at the stockyard because I smell a lot of BS.....

for as much time as he spent on that project, you'd think he would have sprung for a nicer box.

Too much time on his hands.... HAHAHAHAHAHAH... I hate my life...

Awesome, I just saw this a few days ago at Design Miami.


clock good..

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to the post. Inappropriate or promotional comments may be removed. Email addresses are required to confirm comments but will never be displayed. To create a link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments.