Aug 4 2008Montauk Monster: Interview, Speculation

FIRST

no one cares

There is an interesting explanation floating around that ties the creature to the US Government dabbling in things they shouldn’t be messing with.

http://www.astrovera.com/science/time-travel/35-time-travel/51-montauk-monster.html

this has to be the most viewed dog carcass since that madonna picture came out.

That is most definitely a racoon, given the fur type/color and rodent muzzle. It probably just drowned and was nibbled at by various sea creatures. You can see where there used to be teeth in the "beak". The hair loss is a bit of mystery... maybe male pattern baldness? Either way, it's just a rather ugly garbage thief. Mystery solved.

I would speculate, but I haven't had my coffee yet. And before I have my coffee, I just don't care. *sigh*

damn. all this time i thought it was a chick monster but now i can see that it has a meta log and nads . . . sigh. well, maybe it has a sister. I'd be totally into the idea of boning its sister while it watches. *sigh* there are very few of us hopeless romantics left in the world.

There is no way in hell that's a dog or a raccoon or a f***ing turtle without it's shell...why would people even say it's a turtle?

The obvious sign that's it's not a turtle is that turtles don't have teeth the other is that when you remove the shell from a turtle it doesn't just slid off like in a cartoon...a turtles bodies are attached to there shells and removing it removes skin, vital organs, and destroys the turtles bodies...it wouldn't be left that whole.

It's not a dog because in my line of work I've seen my fair share of dog bodies and I've never seen anything like that. The teeth don't fit, the feet don't match up, and the snout isn't right. Even if it was a small breed of dog the snout wouldn't jut down and form what I can only call a beak.

And Raccoon is just retarded...it's not a raccoon.

It looks like my wife before she puts on her makeup

Drowned boar/wild hog. Snout was eaten by sea creatures. Accounts for the tusk-like lower teeth.

Hair falling out from time in the ocean. Same goes for the bloating.

Hogs are all over the place; very plausible that one fell into a river and washed out to sea. Along the way the thing gets all kinds of abused by the ocean. Shows up on shore looking gross as hell.

This thing is no monster.

I;m 18 and wanna find a guy age 30-40 to be my boyfriend ,to see my profile on www.cougarkiss.com

is it just me, or his ass looks roasted like a chicken???

It's obviously a Corina Gadina, also known as a monkey pissing goat. It is described in National Geographic, November, 1979. A creature found mainly living on the Moratious and Dover Islands in the Pacific. It obviously washed ashore and decomposed partially. Look up Corina Gadina (CG).

I think it looks like a pig, but I cannot see the feet well enough to figure out if they are hooves.

But it is probably a fake for that movie, as mentioned before.

i consider myself somewhat of a professional, maybe even a scientist, on monsters. ive had them in my closets and under my beds for over twenty years now. my professional opinion is that this thing is either a Pterodactyl or this fat guy i knew in 4th grade named Henrick.

You know guys? you need a "share" or "send" link or something like that, for us to easily email the articles to the friends :)

is this really still going on... it's a decomposed racoon....
[URL=http://img60.imageshack.us/my.php?image=montaukmonsterracoonod5.jpg][IMG]http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/666/montaukmonsterracoonod5.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Wow It can be a Raccoon then

quick, someone do a horrible photoshop and turn that thing into a crab just to show that if you draw over it like that you can turn it into anything (@17's url). now someone do a version where its grimace from mcdonalds.

Did the font size on this site shrink considerably or is it just me?

its either a dog or a racoon.....NEXT!

alright why the hell did that video cut off right when that dude was about to tell us where to adopt a monster??

IT'S A F***ING GRYPHON. Stupid scientists don't know anything. I have the answers to everything, including just what this is. It's a gryphon with no wings. It did something bad in gryphonland and got sent back down to Earth with no wings.

Seriously though, I want to see the autopsy if they ever do it. I want them to open its eyes o.O But if it's just some water logged dog I'm gonna be disappointed.

New pictures posted at www.montauk-monster.com omg, this is so disgusting!

you guys are all idiots. that thing is a cheese pizza with most of the cheese picked off.

it's not a raccoon, it's ears are to pig-ish

it must be a.... no, couldn't be

I'm going with Viral Marketing. I mean, TWO photos taken by hugely successful fools and the body being "at, like a friends house, in like, a box". Right, and I know that when you really want to believe something you tend to distort your own perception but a f***ing raccoon or hog, you have seen these animals and you know they don't have demon teeth beaks.

Wait....I just figured it out. One word idiots, Chupacabra. It was deep sea ocean fishing with a few buddies and got caught in that last hurricane because Chupacabras don't believe in Doppler radar. It was sucked off its boat then rocketed into space because its bones are made of helium. It then lost its hair and was picked up by the Russians who decided to eat its lips off before planting it in Monatuk to create dissent in the masses. I cant believe I was the first to figure this out, Oprah here I come.

I agree with #27, it's obviously viral marketing... what movie though is the question. Two words, "It's Pat." An SNL remake.

Father?

OMFG IT'S A PIG-DOG!

I didn't know production for Cloverfield 2 has begun. This is gonna be an awesome movie.

Obviously it's not a racoon, it's a time traveling chupacoon from the year 2145, when we wil have to cross breed racoons and chupacabra's becasue all the cows have died and we're hungry for the other grey meat

If it is a real animal, I say its a decomposed Tapir, with no more snout. See?
http://consejo.bz/belize/images/animals/herbivores/tapir.jpg

1. They never show the pictures in the camera.
2. Even if they had, they could have just taken a picture of the photoshopped work.
3. They never answer how big it was.
4. It's going to decay in that box.
5. Viral marketing.

Just got done doing some interwebbing.
Turns out the Project is believed by some to be a continuation of the Philadelphia Experiment. So maybe they tried to make this, um, thing invisible, and just completely f***ed it up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montauk_ProjectMontauk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment

Ok so this may be a stretch but hear me out:
The whole thing is presumed viral marketing... can i say Man-Bear-Pig. If you kind of look closely and compare it to south park's character, it is pretty much a biological form of there cartoon. Idk, it may be a stretch but i think its something in the realm of Trey and Matt

I can't believe it.... Its my Kuato.

faking pictures is easy, but it doesn't have to be fake pictures i think this is a fake monster puppet. it's that simple

Well, there is a fly in pic #2 to provide some perspective. And Gawker has some convincing raccon x-rays and pics to show a match on feet, skull, body shape, teeth etc.

I don't care what it is, I just think its so f***ing cool that even in 2008, with all this technology and internetz and being able to fly around the planet in tin cans we still all gather (virtually) like a bunch of cave people to stare at something weird on the beach and poke it with our metaphorical sticks. In some ways we haven't changed at all since probably the beginning of humanity, and I think that's f***ing awesome.

and we still use our legs and hands and ears and stuffs!! weird!!!! #40 is a scientist!!

I'm pretty sure it's just a pig.

I think it's a pig. Like a javelina. And from being in the water for a time, then it seems reasonable that the hair would have fallen off. If you look at the ears, and the picture looking at the face, it looks alot like a wild pig. Just my 2 cents. But overall, it's nothing "mutant" or weird. It's just a dead animal, and everyone is just too ZOMGWTFBBQ over it.

So... who cares?

Or, it's a pug dog. Yeah, that's what it is. A pug.

It's Man-bear-pig!!

I am currently unaware of this "breed of dogs that have the beaks". Ya know?

"is it just me, or his ass looks roasted like a chicken???"
lmao
anyway i think its a partially decomposed pig

It's sexy. I want it injected in me.

It's clearly a pig. Just a dead rotten pig. Sorry for busting your speculations.

Those "tusklike" lower canines are just that - perfectly ordinary canines. Trust me, pigs have protruding, almost humanlike incisors, their canines (and they really are tusks - those are proper prey-grabbing canines) aren't set that far forward, and their cheek teeth are rounded and bumpy, like our molars. I can't see anything in the photos to suggest that it's not a small dog in the beginning stages of decomp, with the skin beginning to slip. The only thing that makes me unsure is that I can't see the feet properly.

Here's my fun with PhotoShop. Spotting's of the Montauk Monster.
http://www.wthef.com/E/MontaukMonster/eiffel-tower.jpg
http://www.wthef.com/E/MontaukMonster/white_house_south_side.jpg
http://www.wthef.com/E/MontaukMonster/Monsteronthebarby.jpg
http://www.wthef.com/E/MontaukMonster/Big_Ben_8583.jpg

OMG I'm sooo cereal guys!! That's Man-Bear-Pig.

Okay, I thought it was a pig too, but if you look at the neck and head in comparison to the body, it's a little bit out of proportion. On pigs the head usually looks connected directly to the body, this is because the neck is very fat, like in humans, fat grows immensely around the neck. Second of all pigs are fat all over, and this being in the sea for so long(which can obviously be seen) it must have already been bloated. So if we take away some of the bloating by using our imagination, I believe we have too skinny of a pig. Now, having said that, all you idiots who think it is a dog, raccoon, or turtle without a shell, I just can't believe people's perceptions can be that awfully terrible. Count Orlock #8 described perfectly why it could not be a turtle missing it's shell. Now, dog I thought may have been plausible, but then I looked at the feet. Those are most definitely pigs feet and also the ears. So, in conclusion I think this creature may have been an experiment, like said in this URL:
http://www.astrovera.com/science/time-travel/35-time-travel/51-montauk-monster.html
This is the answer that makes the most sense. Trust me, I am good with perception, everyone has different vision, and I have a keen eye for precise perception.

Nah, its just a joke from someone who's good with plastic surgery. The body parts are real, but that's about it. It looks like some sick freak took the body of a dog (hence, the fur), cut off its head and attatched a pig's (look at the ears), cut off the snout and lower jaw, and put in some serious dental work to get that look.

Just can´t you see ? For god sake it´s a f***ing Griphon... well after a mutant treatment with Apocalypse, he drowned before it´s metal wings could be implanted... This or a Lovecraftian Yoshi.

can i just point out that once again the writer has no idea what he's posting, these images are not photoshoped the reason the last 3 are a different colour is because the creature has been rolled over exposing the side that hasnt been burnt and cooked by the sun hence the pale pasty look. also im pretty sure that its a boar thats had its snout and lower lip chewed of by fish when it was in the water..........mistery solved, annoying photoshop coment overruled, thank you and good night.

OMG! Imagination Land Gate is open.

looks like a dog that's been in the water and decomposed- those ladies aren't terribly convincing at interviews either.

Somebody should tell fat and annoying "Kristen Davis"(right) that when you find a f***ing monster on the beach, YOU contact the scientists, not the other way around. If I was a scientist I would not want to deal with this stupid bitch telling me what she thought it was, so I understand why this thing is just gonna rot in some spineless dude who thinks fat "Kristen Davis" might sleep with him's basement. Also it is fake. But not by those girls.

Check out thee original "monster's" front legs... Is it tied up?

Didn't anyone notice it is giving us the finger in the first couple of photos?

Maybe this is their mess-up when they tried to create a human-pig hybrid embryo: http://streetknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/human-pig-hybrid-embryos-given-greenlight/

looks like a deceased Tapir.

wtf in the 3rd and 4th picture down that thing looks like a mutant pitbull if you Imagen it with hair and less rot.

Its definitely categorically and without any doubt whatsoever my ex-mother in law resting AFTER a trip to the beauty salon .......... imagine how PIG ugly she usually looks!!

It looks like it could be some form of boar. it would explain the floppy ears, the hooves, and the tusks. also, arent there some species of pigs and boars that are known to have a full coat of fur? as for a raccoon, not a snowball's chance in hell.

wow its fake, thats pretty saddening, i thought was real... in fact i just lost my house in a bet i made with the homeless guy down the road... wow, that sucks, just like you... wow

wow. you idiots. it is a pitbull. i dont care what any of you say it IS a PITBULL!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montauk_monster
the very last thing they say under the heading: possible identifications. the "beak" is the nose bone. and on this site on the second to last pic above the arm. fur. end of discussion

It's fake! Why else would it looks same in1st and 2nd and different in3rd and 4th?

I just shit my pants :c(

LOL MAN BEAR PIG EXISTS

It looks like my wife before she puts on her makeup