Apr 2 2008Software Program Detects Female Beauty

Tel Aviv University student Amit Kagian has created a program that can detect female faces and features that will be considered beautiful by most people.
It uses 98 parameters that showed up in the faces ranked most beautiful by 30 test subjects, including facial symmetry, hair color, skin texture, and deviation from what was determined to be an "average face."
Allegedly it has proven to be accurate at predicting faces that test groups will find beautiful as well. Super duper, but I don't care. You want to know what a beautiful woman looks like? I'll tell you: She has hair on her head or is bald, has teeth (at least some, but none is okay), preferably doesn't wear a patch (although I can make exceptions), and lacks a penis or it is at least smaller than mine. Actually, scratch all that, my only requirement is boobs. Big or small, I love them all. Hey, that rhymed. I love you ladies. *blink* Damnit, that was supposed to be a wink. *blink* Aww, screw it.
Software spots femaile beauty, but we can already do that [dvice]

Reader Comments
1. bossdj - April 2, 2008 12:32 PM
I don't need a program to tell me if a girl is beautiful, my penis tells me if a girl is hot or not.
2. PB&J - April 2, 2008 1:04 PM
This program will be used in robots to ensure beautiful people are still treated better. Thank God too. I was worried I wouldn't be able to still get free coffee and the door held for me in the mornings.
3. The Laughing G-d - April 2, 2008 1:11 PM
He needs a program to help him define beauty? So he has no penis. Which makes him a woman! Ha, fem!
4. jessee jackson - April 2, 2008 2:00 PM
if i took that test teh computer would try and r@p3 me!
(i'm realy hawt)
5. al sharpton - April 2, 2008 2:01 PM
f*ck u JJ. u look liek a mouth full of piss.
go chug sum piss.
6. Scott - April 2, 2008 2:22 PM
While Jessee Jackson and Al Sharpton fight it out let me just say this:
Boobs are good.
7. Cyberwulf - April 2, 2008 2:34 PM
Yes... boobs are indeed good.
8. SmokingGirl - April 2, 2008 3:05 PM
However, if a man has boobs, or rather moobs, then he should be smote on the spot. Preferably with pebbles and rock salt all within shotgun shells shot at close range.
Violent you say...but I say nay. We must do what we can to stop the mutant men known as Moobzillas.
And yes, as a woman I can say that if a man needs a program inorder to determine beauty, then he wears his ass for a hat and should not be allowed to breed. Thankfully said man could not breed since he would be without testicals...and said man lost his virginity to a vaccum cleaner. Sad really if one thinks about it...
9. Scott - April 2, 2008 4:09 PM
@8, isn't it time for a smoke break? After all, said cancer can't wait forever.....
Now, back to my original thought.....Boobs was it? Yes, I believe it was boobs.
10. 6tringer - April 2, 2008 7:26 PM
I prefer the term "Breasticles", it is inherently funnier than "moobs"
11. SmokingGirl - April 3, 2008 4:33 AM
I surround myself with cancer by smoking in the house. But thank you for your concern...And breasticles is rather comical, but I prefer moobs.
To each their own and to all a good night.
12. V - April 3, 2008 10:03 AM
Seriously, that's a damn shame. What a waste of time and technology.
Anyone with eyes knows that beauty is subjective... Attempting to make it objective only makes the person who's trying into an imbecile.
All women are beautiful. Well, maybe not all, but most. I even like fat chicks.
But I'm totally gaaaaay.
13. Freddy K - April 3, 2008 2:26 PM
I vote for breasticles.
and al sharpton.... give it a rest man. jj just wants all of us to get along right?