Mar 26 2008London Tower To House 100,000 People

London needs to find room to house 100,000 more people by 2016. One solution is this thing, a massive 5,000-foot tall tower (must see picture of the whole thing after the jump) design by the Populararchitecture firm. Reminds me of the plans for Japan's massive building, but this one is less pyramidal and more phallical.
The tower, which at this point remains simply a novel idea, would take up little actual ground space and run like a proper democracy. It is literally broken up into municipal areas--the "neighborhood" is a singe floor of 600; the village is 20 floors and houses 6,000. There are also three super-districts that house 33,000 people each.Elected reps serve in a local government and have regular meetings to decide what to do with common areas, which would include an ice skating rink, a botanical garden, an open-air theater, and tennis courts.
Shit, did that just say tennis courts? Sold! How soon can I sign a lease?
Make sure to hit the jump to see the ridiculously tall tower in full effect.
Related Stories
World's Shortest Man Meets Leggiest Woman (09/17/2008)
Golden: ZOMG, WTF Are Those Things?! (06/14/2009)
Frickin' Huge!: Full-Size Blue Whale Website (05/28/2009)
Not Impressed: The UK's Hottest Halo Fan (02/24/2009)


Reader Comments
1. Meaty_Urologist - March 26, 2008 2:42 PM
I love when architects design buildings after mundane, unrelated things. For instance: sand dunes, staplers, and cardboard paper towel tubes shot up by a bb gun and painted white.
2. Jess - March 26, 2008 2:42 PM
wow. out of place much? And you're right, it is incredibly phallic. You definitiely don't get the full effect until you see the tower in the second photo. And an ice skating rink and theater? Why not leave the building every now and again? It should remain "simply a novel idea."
3. Dutchess of Kickball - March 26, 2008 2:44 PM
The street level picture looked pretty cool and I could get on board with that. The full height...I'm scared.
4. Scott - March 26, 2008 2:50 PM
And I though Jack the floating island, child molester guy designed it....How silly of me.
5. Adam - March 26, 2008 2:56 PM
That has to be going into space.
6. jessee jackson - March 26, 2008 2:56 PM
sometimes i wish i lived in one of those...
then the person here thats keeping me captive hits me with a black jack and i fall asleep.
:(
7. box - March 26, 2008 2:58 PM
the terrorists are going to have a field day with this they might as well just put a gigantic bulls-eye on the top of it.
8. Willravel - March 26, 2008 2:59 PM
As someone who's had to put up with London traffic before, this will create the worst traffic situation in the world.
Don't build it until we've got flying cars, you idiots! Haven't you seen the Jetsons?
9. Mike - March 26, 2008 2:59 PM
I can't wait until that thing goes up and SARS wipes out 80% of its population in a week.
10. jon - March 26, 2008 3:01 PM
Hi, I'm Gary, I live in the giant toilet paper roll behind Buckingham Palace.
Buy you a drink???
11. Mike - March 26, 2008 3:02 PM
You'll probably see our penthouse from there ;-)
12. Sara - March 26, 2008 3:06 PM
A million people in one building? This is going to be target number one for a well placed bomb in london for sure. What an awful idea. How in god's name would they work security into this bitch? What about elevators? How long would it take to get to the top floor and what if there was a fire? It's not like you'd have a hope in hell of getting out if you were on the top floor. I do not understand what some people are thinking when they design shit like this.
13. freaksout - March 26, 2008 3:12 PM
two thumbs up for flying cars, two thumbs and a third leg up for complimentary jet-packs fueled by REALLY BAD IDEAS!!
14. russell - March 26, 2008 3:17 PM
the word you are looking for is "Phallical"
15. damn luddites - March 26, 2008 3:22 PM
I'd hate to just miss the elevator on my way out in the morning. now, if they made every tenth floor into office space, and you could work in the build as well... it'd still be a shitty idea
16. Jeezy - March 26, 2008 3:38 PM
I realize this is just an idea/concept, but would something like this be even remotely possible? It seems like would take 100 years to build.
17. Amy - March 26, 2008 3:42 PM
Yeah definitely not a good idea until they've come up with a brilliant way to get out of even the top floor quickly (hoover cars? jetpacks? the Force?). This would work in some place out in the Stars...even if it is a place torn by Wars.
18. Angel Mass - March 26, 2008 3:43 PM
Hello, like, all those whole around it, just one word: ANTITERRORIST attacks!
19. Kelcey - March 26, 2008 3:43 PM
What I dont understand is....
where are they gonna find the mexicans to build this thing?
They'll probably have to import them by the 100 thou!
Does nobody else ever think of how scary it would be to have to fricken BUILD one of these massive structures? I'm afriad of heights!
20. Jason - March 26, 2008 3:46 PM
oh man! once that thing goes up i can finally put this earthquake machine into action!
21. guate6 - March 26, 2008 3:48 PM
Yeah, like all have said: bad idea. At least the Japanese building is a little more realistic (a little).
22. nora - March 26, 2008 4:19 PM
bitch would need one hell of a parking lot to go with it.
23. David - March 26, 2008 4:23 PM
Is it me, or is that thing leaning a bit in the second photo?
24. Paul H - March 26, 2008 4:27 PM
reminds me of Sim City 3000 when does it launch?
25. Isaac - March 26, 2008 4:30 PM
Why is it that people who comment on these sites are so stupid?
26. Nathan - March 26, 2008 4:38 PM
It looks like Kerplunk.
27. Vince Lombardi - March 26, 2008 4:41 PM
It's the perfect anti-terror design. Bad guys hijack a plane, plan to fly it into the building and... ZIP!..... fly right out the other side. Neener, neener.... MISSED ME!
28. groonk - March 26, 2008 4:45 PM
Rama is real.
29. Nathan - March 26, 2008 4:47 PM
17 and 27, lol.
30. Danielson - March 26, 2008 4:54 PM
Yeah, and when there is a fire, everyone is f***ed.
31. The Laughing God - March 26, 2008 4:55 PM
Yeah London needs to invest more money in their anti bombing situation, before they build any large towers.
32. TJ - March 26, 2008 5:08 PM
I'm in if the spiral is a ramp that I can ride a bike down (or ski or something)
33. SlowMonkey - March 26, 2008 6:22 PM
And what happens when these million people all try to go to work at 8am? By the time they get there, it will be time to go home.
34. Vince Lombardi - March 26, 2008 7:51 PM
When they say "one MILLION people," does Mike Myers laugh menacingly?
35. emily - March 26, 2008 8:32 PM
Holy Christ! It looks like a kitty scratch post! Except chock-full of poorly-dentistried eelsuckers (a new epithet I'm coining... I like it!)
36. dsdsds - March 26, 2008 8:35 PM
"kids put on ur oxygen masks, i wanna open the window"
37. dick valentine - March 26, 2008 9:31 PM
wow it is so beautiful...hmmm..good thing it wont be built. Mega housing projects suck - why? - projects = shit - putting alot of people into a small confinded area = social and political problems. thats why when you have projects - shit happens ..and in huge numbers.
why dont you put a sign up...London full - f*** off. im not from europe, i live in asia. and really i dont understand why u dont do that. if some small place..needs peopel..its okay...but when u have 18,000,000 people in shanghai - really we dont need more people. too many problems.
38. bird - March 27, 2008 12:15 AM
Holy sh-t it is science fiction in action. Please stop having more babies. Yikes scary.
39. Simon - March 27, 2008 1:36 AM
Looks crooked
40. laz - March 27, 2008 6:08 AM
doesn't london have height restrictions?
41. don't know - March 27, 2008 7:41 AM
Couldn't it be less tall (and thus more likely to be developed) while still housing a million people if it didn't have all the holes in it like a giant cylinder of swiss cheese and if the center weren't hollow?
42. Jack - March 27, 2008 8:21 AM
It looks so tall in contrast to the London street buildings. But I'd say the twin towers were at least 3/4 as tall, and the tallest building in the world (someone help me here?) may be just as tall?
One question, can the building withstand the gale wind in Britain?
I really hope the silly council people of London would lift the height restriction in London. The city is crying out for some innovative, spectacular high rise in its skyline.
43. Tall Face - March 27, 2008 8:32 AM
what if they cut it up into smaller pieces? or put three quarters of it underground? or tried to pass it off as the worlds largest swiss cheese stick?
44. absinthe - March 27, 2008 8:51 AM
LOL we couldn't build a Mechano scale model of it here in London much before 2250 - the bureaucracy here is terrible! Even then we'd be 15 trillion over budget & 2 centuries behind ;)
45. Morono - March 27, 2008 10:17 AM
a singe floor of 600; the village is 20 floors and houses 6,000. There are also three super-districts that house 33,000 people each.
600+120.000+99.000=219.600?
46. Morono - March 27, 2008 10:18 AM
ans no, the twin towers were not 3/4 of 5000 ft not by far
47. Rachel M - March 27, 2008 11:04 AM
It's actually meant to house about 100,000 people, not a million.
Here's a quote from the original website.
"The tower is broken up into a hierarchy of municipal areas. The smallest; the neighbourhood occupies a single floor - approximately 600 people, the next; the village covers 20 floors and approximately 6000 people. The tower is finally divided into three super-districts; upper, mid and lower of 33,000 people each"
That brings the grand total to 115,600. That's nowehere near a million.
See citation here
http://www.popularchitecture.com/supertower/
48. Angry - March 27, 2008 11:11 AM
Oh my, that's one hideous building. It looks so awkward and out of place in contrast to the rest of London.
49. John - March 27, 2008 11:39 AM
If you click the link, it says 1,000,000 people, not just 100,000
even in the link says one million, i think the geekologie guy forgot a zero... and a comma...
50. John - March 27, 2008 11:41 AM
oops, edit, 100,000 is correct, sorry
51. Vince Lombardi - March 27, 2008 12:10 PM
@17 - Knucklehead, "anti-terrorist attacks" are what the GOOD GUYS do to prevent the BAD GUYS from doing "terrorist attacks."
Dumb f***.
52. Team America - March 27, 2008 12:33 PM
It could be 9 / 11 times 10,278,683... What is that??
Nobody knowssssssssssss......
53. Clem - March 27, 2008 2:29 PM
@19, English Mexicans are called The Polish.
The building looks crap and if it ever goes up, which it won't, it won't be nearly big enough to house all the illegal immigrants.
54. Binx - March 27, 2008 3:42 PM
Imagine how windy it would be in the upper 'parks'. It would probably blow you off the building.
55. red - March 27, 2008 10:17 PM
do people even THINK before coming up with this? like this would actually be built its freaking a million times bigger than anything in London. Its also ugly. And parks at the top WOULD be too windy. What an idiot. The street level view was cool though.
56. Yawn-Malice - March 29, 2008 5:10 AM
If that thin line swirling around the outside of the tower was a slide, it would all be worth it no matter how much the cost
57. Jenny Rhiann - March 30, 2008 7:50 PM
If that thing goes up Im moving out of london. Full stop.
Its disgusting, i dont get why people feel the need to build horrible tall buildings. I hope london doesnt lift the height restriction,
If you cant find a normal f***ing house dont move to my city.
58. cheesecake_plz - April 1, 2008 12:53 AM
mmmm swiss cheese
59. Simon - April 8, 2008 3:10 PM
About time they started building arcologies.
60. Naysay - August 27, 2008 10:17 PM
Btw Russell (commented somewhere near the top). It's phallic. He was right before. So before being such a pedant I urge you to actually look up appropriate grammatical terms.
61. Boo - November 5, 2008 10:39 AM
Crappy design. Doesn't make sense. And we all know it will never work. Even in a million years.